|
FIND A POLICY
Browse by Categories
Alphabetical List of Policies
Policies by Process
Policy User Resources
Policy Owner Resources
Coordinate Campus Policy Sites
|
Managing Potential Institutional Conflicts of Interest: Licensing and Technology Transfer |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
Last Updated: June 2006
Responsible University Officer:
Procedure Contact:
|
|
 |
|
 |
Explanation:
Researchers at the University often create patentable and commercially viable
ideas. The University negotiates with businesses to use this intellectual property
in exchange for royalties or other cash payments. The University may also assist
the researcher with creating a business to commercialize the intellectual property
in exchange for a share of the company.
Potential institutional conflicts of interest may take place or appear to
take place when the University is receiving the royalties or holding equity
in the start-up and University researchers continue to conduct projects sponsored
by the commercial licensee or start-up or enter into some other business or
financial relationship with it. Even where the researchers do not have personal
stakes in the project, knowledge that the University stands to gain financially
from successful development of a licensed technology can influence the direction
of related research or other University activity, the objectivity of research,
the dissemination of results and the allocation of resources among competing
projects and activities.
Example of potential conflict situation:
A college gets significant revenue from royalties for a drug licensed by Company
X. A researcher in the department wants to conduct research on a new drug that
if successful, could eliminate that revenue stream. The dean is asked to review
the proposal and provide administrative approval to conduct research on the
new drug.
There is an additional potential institutional conflict of interest when the
University holds equity in the start-up. A potential conflict could arise if
the office making an investment decision is also responsible in some way for
the research and has intimate knowledge about the technology licensed and the
company holding the license.
Process for Potential Conflict Identification and Management (royalties and
other income)
- Identify the potential conflict:
- Researchers completing applications for Institutional Review Board review
are asked whether the proposed study evaluates directly or indirectly
a University invention. If so, a copy of the application is forwarded
to the Regulatory Affairs Officer.
- Twice a year, the Office of Technology Commercialization (OTC) will
give a report to the Regulatory Affairs Office of all companies that paid
more than $100,000 the prior year to the University and will report the
units and faculty that receive a share of the revenue. The Regulatory
Affairs Officer will compare that list against a database of research
sponsors and principal investigators and a database of potential vendors.
If those companies also have a financial or business relationship with
the unit or the principal investigator, the Regulatory Affairs Office
will gather information for evaluation.
- OTC will email the Regulatory Affairs Officer when their staff are preparing
an exclusive license or option agreement. The Regulatory Affairs Officer
will check information about research sponsors, vendors and gift donors
to determine whether the potential licensee or startup company also has
other types of financial or business relationships with the University.
The Regulatory Affairs Officer will then inform OTC staff if execution
of the license or option should be delayed pending review and management
of any potential institutional conflict of interest.
- Employees or other individuals concerned about possible conflicts of
interest may report situations to University officials.
- Review any potential conflict:
The Regulatory Affairs Officer and Executive Committee of the Institutional
Conflict Review Committee will evaluate the risk of an institutional conflict,
consulting with other offices or individuals as necessary.
- If the licensing or equity relationship could affect or appear to affect
research involving human subjects, the matter will automatically be referred
to the Institutional Conflict Review Committee.
- If there is little risk that the licensing or equity relationship can
affect or appear to affect University teaching, research, outreach or
other activities, the Regulatory Affairs Officer will include the matter
in a report that is reviewed by the Board of Regents and distributed to
the Institutional Conflict Review Committee.
- If there is a risk that the relationship can affect or appear to affect
University teaching, research, outreach or other activities, the Regulatory
Affairs Officer will refer the matter to the Institutional Conflict Review
Committee.
- Create a management plan, if needed:
If a management plan is appropriate, the Institutional Conflict Review
Committee will develop it.
- Determine whether the potential conflict management plan must be
approved by the Regents
The Regulatory Affairs Officer and the Executive Committee of the Institutional
Conflict Review Committee will evaluate whether the potential conflict management
plan fits the criteria for Regents' approval (it presents an unusually significant
financial impact, it involves the president, it raises serious policy issues
or has a significant public impact on the University's mission or reputation,
or it needs their review under the Reservation and Delegation of Authority
policy). If so, the President or delegate will bring the plan to them for
review and action. If not, the Regulatory Affairs Officer will summarize
the management plan in an annual report to the Regents.
- Implement the management plan
Once the Institutional Conflict Review Committee or Regents approve the
management plan, the appropriate University official will implement it.
- Oversight
The Institutional Conflict Review Committee works with the appropriate
senior officer to implement conflict management decisions as needed. The
committee also verifies post-approval compliance with the management plan
and addresses any issues that arise. They will also review reports of low-risk
situations and may request inquiries into specific situations.
Process for Potential Conflict Identification and Management (start-ups and
equity interests):
- Identify the potential conflict:
- For conflicts of interest that could arise when the University is negotiating
a possible equity interest in a start-up company, potential conflicts
will be identified when licensing associates in Patents and Technology
Marketing are developing agreements that include an equity interest in
the new company of 5% or greater. There is no threshold if it is likely
that the start-up company may sponsor research at the University that
involves human subjects. Before finalizing these agreements, the licensing
associate will contact the Regulatory Affairs Officer for information
on current and potential research projects or other business or financial
relationships.
- For conflicts of interest that could arise when the University already
holds equity in a company, the University generally avoids risks associated
with this type of institutional conflict by separating equity information
and decision-making from the research enterprise. Once an equity agreement
is signed, decisions regarding the equity and voting are made by outside
firms and the office of Asset Management. Employees in the position to
directly influence research, teaching, outreach, or other activities do
not make decisions regarding these equity interests.
If Asset Management is asked to vote on behalf of the institution
on an issue involving a company in which the University holds equity
because of a technology license, Asset Management will consult with
the Institutional Conflict Review Committee to ensure that conflict
situations are avoided. OTC will keep Asset Management and outside equity
management firms informed about companies in which the University holds
equity because of a license. Asset Management or the outside firm responsible
for the decision to sell the equity will determine whether or not such
information can be used to make this decision without violating laws
and regulations concerning insider trading.
- Review any potential conflict:
The Regulatory Affairs Officer will evaluate the risk of an institutional
conflict, consulting with individuals and offices involved in the arrangement
as necessary.
- If the equity arrangement may involve a research project that involves
human subjects, the matter will automatically be referred to the Institutional
Conflict Review Committee.
- If there is little risk that the equity arrangement will affect or appear
to affect research, teaching, or outreach activities at the University,
the Regulatory Affairs Officer will include the matter in a report that
is reviewed by the Board of Regents.
- If there is a risk that the arrangement can affect or appear to affect
research, teaching, or outreach activities at the University, the Regulatory
Affairs Officer will refer the matter to the Institutional Conflict Review
Committee.
- Create a management plan, if needed:
If a management plan is appropriate, the Institutional Conflict Review
Committee will develop it.
- Determine whether the potential conflict management plan must be
approved by the Regents
The Regulatory Affairs Officer and the Executive Committee of the Institutional
Conflict Review Committee will evaluate whether the potential conflict management
plan fits the criteria for Regents' approval (it presents an unusually significant
financial impact, it involves the president, it raises serious policy issues
or has a significant public impact on the University's mission or reputation,
or it needs their review under the Reservation and Delegation of Authority
policy). If so, the President or delegate will bring the plan to them for
review and action. If not, the Regulatory Affairs Officer will summarize
the management plan in an annual report to the Regents.
- Implement the management plan
Once the Institutional Conflict Review Committee or Regents approve the
management plan, the appropriate University official will implement it.
- Oversight
The Institutional Conflict Review Committee verifies post-approval compliance
with the management plan and addresses any issues that arise.
|